Have I generally liked whatever I saw done by Vita so far? In fact, the answer may be no, but considerations are kind of complicated after all. I loved her from the very first moment I saw her, it actually happens few times after all, so, I guess it means something.
Questions are multi-faceted, “considerations are kind of complicated” I wrote right above, and well, this is a “@” post so I won’t see the thing in detail, but… generally, you can find Vita interesting and questionable from so many points of view, it’s about her expressivity, the kind of beauty she embodies, body structure, and so on.
Despite what I read around (the web) or listened to talking about her, I appreciated the little I saw on the runway. I liked it by itself, and considering development and what can come out from that. Height is not a problem from my point of view (1.73), because of her presence, and because of her proportions, especially considering shots and what she showed so far. She’s got an amazing body structure I like a lot (really a lot), and it’s one of those cases where “She’s 1.73, so? Who cares?!” appears evident and kind of indisputable I guess.
by tess feuilhade
Then, two things I really care about: the kind of beauty Vita is, and her expressivity.
I have to say I find more complicated the first point, ‘cause despite her expressivity may look not perfect… well, I just think is a matter of development, and so with time things will go better and better; and even right now it’s not that bad after all: in fact I’m not mad about how she “flirts with the camera” (in a good sense) at the moment, but generally for what I saw so far (on the runway as well) I like a lot that cold, calm and collected attitude. So, it’s about the “must have chapter” (confidence, always look comfortable, always look great, and so on), and something more Vika absolutely has.
by tess feuilhade
And now, the point I find more interesting, and from so many points of view: her beauty. What kind of beauty Vika is, and she can embody for the best? If you saw some pics where she looked so cute and pretty and whatever, you thought she may be the umpteenth pure-cuteness fresh face – I accept everyone’s opinions, but I guess you’re quite wrong. She’s got a strong and cryptic beauty, so interesting, so peculiar, so inscrutable and impenetrable. What I love is, yep, this unique mix, she looks at the same time so fresh, and mature, intriguing, an austere, self-confident and strong femininity that can seduce and intrigue like few others around. And from some points of view, in fact Vika seems to be really unique.
So yep, she’s got to develop, absolutely, improve the way she poses, expressivity, but there are things you can’t change, you have or not, Vika absolutely has imo; if I look at these pics, well, the “how” is flawless and noteworthy, the editorial is well done, and Vika: you may love the kind of beauty she is or not, she doesn’t always look perfect (and it’s part of the “development process” I wrote about, so nothing to worry about) – but I’m so fascinated and attracted by this, for a reason or another I simply can’t take my eyes off these shots, and… she’s a “work in progress”, ok, but what such an interesting, fascinating and intriguing one.